Natalie Barbir vs Kirra Bond-Scott Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L L L
Form
L L L L W L L W W LHead To Head: Barbir 1 - 0 Bond-Scott
They have played 3 sets in total, with Barbir winning 2 and Bond-Scott winning 1. The last match between Barbir and Bond-Scott was at the W35 Cairns, 07-10-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Natalie Barbir getting the victory 5-7 6-1 13-11.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Natalie Barbir | 1 |
| Kirra Bond-Scott | 0 |
W35 Cairns(07-10-2024)
5
7
6
1
13
11
| Barbir | Stats | Bond-Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (3-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 35 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 21% (38-140) | Career Total W/L | 32% (8-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Barbir VS Bond-Scott H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-1 13-11 | |||||
Barbir VS Bond-Scott H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 24 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Natalie Barbir
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kanako Osafune
Player
Natalie Barbir
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandra Osborne
Player
Natalie Barbir
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Natalie Barbir
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Natalie Barbir
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Stella Knez
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
18
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirra Bond-Scott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gurmanat Kaur Sandhu
Player
Kirra Bond-Scott
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Eunji Oh
Player
Kirra Bond-Scott
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Kirra Bond-Scott
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21% (38/140) | Win/Loss | 32% (8/17) |
| 25% (95/290) | Sets Win/Loss | 34% (20/39) |
| 37% (1240/2072) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (258/331) |
| 20% (12/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 27% (4/11) |
| 20% (21/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (3/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 38 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 162 | Total Double Faults | 26 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 89.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 61.4 |
| 61% (1469/2393) | 1st Serve % | 58% (196/339) |
| 50% (729/1469) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (114/196) |
| 34% (316/924) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (55/143) |
| 42% (89/210) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 39% (861/2229) | Return Points Win % | 34% (111/327) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (17/64) | Challenger W/L | 30% (6/14) |
| 22% (21/76) | Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 20% (35/174) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (8/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (12/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 28% (9/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 78% (41/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 63% (8/5) |
| 22% (41/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 38% (8/3) |
| 4% (137/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
